Abstract
A committee of experts votes between a multi-attribute alternative and status quo. Each expert is a biased specialist who can privately evaluate only one attribute and puts more weight on it. We study whether a social-minded principal would compose the committee of more or less biased experts. We find that due to strategic voting, her optimal composition depends non-monotonically on the majority rule. The composition is, however, less crucial if experts can be uninformed. Nonetheless, the principal may prefer to have some uninformed experts, perhaps by rushing the vote, when the committee is large, or its composition is suboptimal.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
