Abstract
This study evaluated and minimized bias in estuarine total dissolved solids (TDS) patterns predicted using geostatistical approaches. The acquired TDS data was divided into three parts: 29 points (60 %) for predicting TDS patterns with spatial interpolation techniques, 12 points (25 %) for validation and bias correction, and 7 points (37 %) for testing the corrected bias. Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Ordinary Kriging (OK), Universal Kriging (UK) and Regression Kriging (RK) were applied to map TDS patterns. R-square and Relative Error of Mean showed significant discrepancies between observed and predicted TDS levels. The Mean field bias (MFB) correction technique was applied to minimize bias in TDS patterns. After correcting bias, the TDS values predicted by IDW, OK, UK and RK at random locations deviated from measured values by −2.85 %, 0.71 %, 4.66 %, and − 6.03 % respectively. At the test locations, these values deviated by −1.45 %, 1.41 %, 2.11 %, and − 2.65 % respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.