Abstract

Traditional multi-parameter single distribution quantile mapping (QM) methods excel in some respects in correcting climate model precipitation, but are limited in others. Multi-parameter mixed distribution quantile mapping can potentially exploit the strengths of single distribution methods and avoid their weaknesses. The correction performance of mixed distribution QM methods varies with the geographical location they are applied to and the combination of distributions that are included. This study compares multiple sets of single distribution and multi-parameter mixed distribution QM methods in order to correct the precipitation bias in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River basin (UYRB) in RegCM4 simulated precipitation. The results show that, among the selected distributions, the gamma distribution has the highest performance in the basin; explaining more than 50% of the precipitation events based on the weighting coefficients. The Gumbel distribution had the worst performance, only explaining about 10% of the precipitation events. The performance parameters, such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and the correlation coefficient (R) of the corrected precipitation, that were derived by using mixed distribution were better than those derived by using single distribution. The QM method that is based on the gamma-generalized extreme value distribution best corrected the precipitation, could reproduce the annual cycle and geographical pattern of observed precipitation, and could significantly reduce the wet bias from the RegCM4 model in the UYRB. In addition to enhancing precipitation climatology, the correction method also improved the simulation performance of the RegCM4 model for extreme precipitation events.

Highlights

  • Climate models are essential tools for studying climate change at global and regional scales

  • Themeßl et al [14] compared numerous methods for correcting precipitation bias in climate models. They found that the quantile mapping (QM) method has the best overall bias correction performance for precipitation that is simulated by regional climate model (RCM), especially in improving the simulation’s performance for extreme precipitation events

  • To overcome the limitations of the traditional QM method that is based on the multi-parameter single distribution, we used the multiparameter binary mixed distribution QM method in order to correct the precipitation biases simulated by the RegCM4 model for the upper reaches of the Yangtze River basin (UYRB)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate models are essential tools for studying climate change at global and regional scales. Heterogeneous mixture distributions can effectively correct the precipitation simulated by climate models, the large difference in precipitation structure across different regions and the diverse influences of extreme precipitation events make the same distribution not necessarily as effective in these regions This inevitably requires a study on the adaptation of the mixed distribution of precipitation in a specific area in order to determine the best distribution [22]. To overcome the limitations of the traditional QM method that is based on the multi-parameter single distribution, we used the multiparameter binary mixed distribution QM method in order to correct the precipitation biases simulated by the RegCM4 model for the UYRB. Based on the performance evaluation results of the precipitation bias correction, the mixed distribution function with the best performance was able to be determined for the UYRB RegCM4 simulation. The area and runoff of the UYRB account for 59% and 46% of the YRB, Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1566

Study Area
Mixed Distribution QM
Analysis Methods
Correction Performance of Different Distribution Functions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call