BI01 Disseminated Nannizziopsis fungal infection in a kidney transplant recipient: iguanas, immunosuppression or international travel?

Abstract

Abstract Transplant waiting list demographics are changing profoundly in some parts of the UK, partly due to trends in global migration. This has significant implications for the spectrum of post-transplant skin malignancies and skin infections presenting to dermatologists. We present a kidney transplant recipient born in Nigeria who developed disseminated infection with Nannizziopsis spp., an emerging pathogenic fungus in humans and reptiles. A 64-year-old man from Nigeria who received a kidney transplant 10 months earlier was referred to our 2-week-wait skin cancer clinic with a 4-cm tender, ulcerated nodule on his left thigh that had been present for 2 months. He was being investigated for possible pulmonary Aspergillus infection and also had a fluctuant subcutaneous mass over the right tibia with suspected osteomyelitis. On examination, he had a similar plaque on his right hand, fluctuant subcutaneous nodules of his left flank and left upper arm, a 20-cm fluctuant swelling over his right tibia and a 2-cm plaque of his hard palate. Skin biopsy from the left flank and thigh showed suppurative granulomatous inflammation and fungal hyphae in the dermis and macrophages with septation and 45° branching. β-D-Glucan was positive and molecular identification revealed Nannizziopsis spp. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head did not show evidence of central nervous system infection. He was treated with intravenous amphotericin B for 2 months and subsequent oral posaconazole with resolution of skin and lung infection. Nannizziopsis is a genus of fungi that usually infects reptiles such as iguanas, geckos and chameleons, snakes, turtles and crocodiles. It causes cutaneous and musculoskeletal granulomatous infections which can be rapidly fatal. Fewer than 20 human cases have been reported, mostly related to travel to West Africa. Almost all infections are in immunocompromised individuals and species of Nannizziopsis reported to affect humans are generally different from those identified in animals. Our patient denied contact with reptiles, but he had travelled to Nigeria before his transplant where he probably acquired a latent infection that reactivated post-transplant. This case illustrates the importance of biopsy and culture of atypical skin lesions, particularly in immunocompromised patients. With the rising global migration and travel, such infections are likely to be seen more frequently in the UK, and both residential and travel history may be relevant. Finally, zoonotic infections are increasing globally as interspecies barriers break down. Although there is not enough evidence to caution against ownership of exotic pets in immunocompromised individuals, animal sources of rare infections should always be considered in this patient group.