Abstract
The accidental release of methyl isocyanate (MIC) on December 2 and 3, 1984, at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide manufacturing plant in Bhopal, India, killed at least 1,750 people, and probably as many as 2,500, 1 while injuring 50,000 or more. This episode appears likely to mark a watershed in the historical relationships between scientists, corporations, governments and communities. Among the many assumptions that will have to be questioned and reconsidered in the wake of this disaster are the following: that it is possible, in principle, to know enough in advance about a complex chemical process to design a totally safe system; that it is possible, in principle, for human workers to operate such a system safely; that it is possible, in principle, for a public agency to regulate such a system effectively (even if it could be designed); and that “fault” in the legal sense can be meaningfully attributed to one among the various actors in the event of a complex system failure. The above questions all arise prominently in connection with the Bhopal tragedy. This paper recounts the key factors insofar as they are known, commenting on the information available to various parties and the decisions that were made. Some general conclusions are drawn at the end.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
