Abstract
My article uses Bohemian jurisprudence between the 17th and the 20th centuries to showcase the interpretive benefits of a relational history of Habsburg Central Europe that both moves beyond artificial national divisions and sacrosanct epochal thresholds, 1918 in particular. Since the 17th century, Bohemiaâs position at the interstices between the Holy Roman Empire and the Habsburg lands made its jurisprudence a centre of sprawling innovation: Prague jurist Franz X. Neumann disputed the Holy Roman Empireâs suzerainty over Bohemia and hence dismantled claims about the automatic validity of Roman law for the kingdom of St. Wenceslaus. This position at the fringes of the Holy Roman Empire turned Bohemia into a hotbed of natural law and into the chief fulcrum of Habsburg private law codification under Maria Theresia (1750s). The Bohemian ingredient also played a crucial role in Leo ThunâHohensteinâs reform of the Habsburg Monarchyâs educational system in the 1850s: A Bohemian noble patriot, ThunâHohenstein sought to extirpate natural law, which he viewed as the mainspring of Revolution and centralisation â the two menaces that subverted Bohemiaâs statehood within the Monarchy. Thunâs hostility to panâimperial public law and to social contract theories destroyed the validity grounds of Habsburg legal culture but reinforced the primacy of private law. Thereby Thun produced a legal positivism that depended on the categories of Pandectist private law and permeated ostensibly sharply separated ânationalâ communities of lawyers, as I show with reference to Czech and Germanspeaking jurists in Bohemia, the schools of JiÅà Pražák and Joseph Ulbrich in particular. My paper moves beyond 1918 to flesh out the Monarchyâs legal and administrative legacy that cuts against the grain of programmatic DeâAustrification (OdrakouÅ¡tÄnÃ), and discusses the longevity of the Monarchyâs 1867 December constitution in postâ1918 Czechoslovakia. Swallowing their pride, German nationalists of different hues retracted their preâ1918 criticisms of the constitution and rediscovered it as a weapon against the Versailles system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have