Abstract
In-situ titrations employed in the estimation of active site densities oftentimes only provide upper bound estimates, not true active site densities. Discounting unselective contributions that result in a disparity between the two requires a treatment of transient titration data more nuanced than merely integrating under the titrant breakthrough curve. Three methods for estimating site densities (and turnover frequencies) are presented in the context of ceria-catalyzed ethene hydrogenation, and their strengths and limitations discussed. Readily accessible supra-monolayer coverages of CO prevalent on ceria surfaces help bring into relief considerations relating to unselective adsorption and active site heterogeneity common, yet infrequently addressed, in the characterization of heterogeneous catalysts using in-situ titration methods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.