Beyond the Square knot: A validation study for a novel knot-tying method named “inverse 9”

Abstract

PurposeWe compared the “inverse 9” laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying (LSKT) method to the traditional LSKT method in a validation study to demonstrate the “inverse 9” method's superiority and effectiveness in laparoscopy. MethodsOn the basis of their experience in laparoscopic surgery, 78 trainees were divided into two groups, with 52 inexperienced trainees in group A and 26 experienced trainees in group B. In group A, 52 trainees were randomly allocated to either group A1 (“inverse 9” LSKT training) or group A2 (traditional LSKT training). In group B, experienced trainees were randomly assigned to receive “inverse 9” LSKT training (group B1) or continuing training in the traditional LSKT method (group B2). All trainees received the same instruction and assessment and were asked to provide a subjective assessment of the two training methods at the end of the training. ResultsThe trainees in groups A1, A2, and B had similar average ages and were mostly male. After training, all showed preliminary mastery of LSKT (P < 0.05). The trainees in groups A1 and B1 achieved learning proficiency in the fifth assessment, while those in group A2 achieved it in the sixth assessment. The trainees in groups A1 and B1 showed lower difficulty in achieving mastery and lower operation fatigue scores (P < 0.05), and 61.50 % of the trainees in group B preferred the “inverse 9” method in subjective evaluation. ConclusionAs a novel LSKT technique, “inverse 9” offers a multitude of benefits. In addition to ensuring a simpler operation and effectively reducing the knot-tying time, it also involves a shorter learning curve than traditional LSKT methods. As such, it can be easily mastered and widely adopted as a standard LSKT technique.