Abstract

Despite the arbitrary postulate of empty space (which was as arbitrary as the old aether), Albert Einstein obtained through the conceptually powerful postulate of the constancy of light velocity in any reference system, the relativistic equations of motion. The kinematic basis of Special relativity was responsible of several physical paradoxes that accompanied the growing reliability of SR along the XX century. Conversely, in the Micro-quanta paradigm the particle dynamics is directly derived in dynamical conditions from Compton's collisions between particles and the isotropic flux fo of micro-waves filling the space with speed c and energy Eo. When considering the proper Doppler function for waves incident forwards and behind any moving particle, the balance between the two opposite momenta gives the momentum predicted by SR and defines also the rest-mass mi of the particle, which results (equivalence mass-energy) to the energy mic2 = NiEo, where Ni = (si to fo) is the number of quanta colliding simultaneously with the particle during the interaction time to. In the M-Q paradigm the uniform flux fills everywhere the space, so particles “measure” their effective velocity through the momentum of Compton's collisions. The old inertial frames of reference become unnecessary. Any particle moving uniformly in strait-line is shown to collide with micro-quanta without receiving any net force (Principle of inertia). When the particle velocity is not constant and uniform during the interaction time, the local energy density 'o = foEo/c gives rise to the inertial forces. Since two particles immersed in the quantum flux always show mutual shielding, they feel a pushing force which is recognised to be the gravitational force. Thus, the concept of “gravitational mass” is discarded. This inevitably requires to re-examine the fundamentals of General relativity which appears inadequate to explain the recent observations of the accelerating universe achieved through the Ia supernovae measurements. Even the Strong nucleonic force and the Weak force on electrons at very short distances are shown to originate from mutual shielding in the M-Q paradigm. Despite micro-quanta are very small, they do not lose the fundamental characteristics of the quantum waves. The very little quantum energy Eo= hono is coupled to a very little action constant and a very small quantum wavelength lo (of the order of the Planck’s length), so that the number of quanta simultaneously incident on a nucleon is about Nn »1050. This explains why the inertial forces were for three centuries (from Newton up to Einstein) believed to originate from the continuum of space and time, instead of from physical objects.

Highlights

  • Special Relativity arose in 1905 when a young scientist, Albert Einstein, gave an intuitive physical interpretation of the strange effects of “time dilation and length contraction” arising from the coordinate transformation of moving particles, firstly described by H.A

  • Many scientists attend every two years, initially in London up to 1995 and presently in Moscow, the PIRT Conferences (Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory). This testifies that the problem of giving Special Relativity (SRT) a physical basis is still in the minds of physicists

  • The recent enlargement of the observational universe put troubles with the relativistic cosmological models, which have been disproved by the acceleration of the far universe observed through the measure of distant Supernovae Ia (Riess, 1998, Perlmutter, 1999) in contrast with the deceleration required by the Newton's “universal constant G” assumed in General relativity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Special Relativity arose in 1905 when a young scientist, Albert Einstein, gave an intuitive physical interpretation of the strange effects of “time dilation and length contraction” arising from the coordinate transformation of moving particles, firstly described by H.A. The recent enlargement of the observational universe put troubles with the relativistic cosmological models, which have been disproved by the acceleration of the far universe observed through the measure of distant Supernovae Ia (Riess, 1998, Perlmutter, 1999) in contrast with the deceleration required by the Newton's “universal constant G” assumed in General relativity. This revolutionary discovery is discussed in par.

Considerations about the New Physical Paradigms
The variation of G in Preceding Cosmological Theories
Effects of the “Gravitational Mass” Misconception
Quantum Pushing Gravity and the Observation of the “Gravitational” Waves
Fundamentals of Quantum Pushing Gravity
The Einstein’s Postulates of Special Relativity
The Photon Emission as Described in the M-Q Paradigm
M-Q paradigm drops the Inertial Frames of Reference
Micro-quanta Generates the Mass and Momentum of Particles
The Origin of the Inertial Mass
10. Balance of the Compton’s Collisions under General Principles of Physics
11. The Fundamental Equation of Dynamics in the M-Q Paradigm
11.1 Why Sr Introduces the Longitudinal and Transversal Mass of Particles?
12. Inertial Forces Originate from the Local M-Q Energy Density
13.2 The Weak Force on the Electron
14. On the Velocity of Interaction Waves
15. Beta Decay

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.