Abstract

ABSTRACT Rural areas are struggling with youth mobility to urban centers. We address this challenge by testing the interplay between objective factors underlying mobility, namely socio-economic status indicators, and subjective factors, specifically Place Attachment (PA) and Future Time Perspective (FTP), and how they connect with the returning intentions of university students with a rural background after their graduation. We also explore how the connections between these variables vary across gender. Our study involved 337 university students (M = 21.55; SD = 2.48; 63.50% female) enrolled in tertiary education in mainland Portugal. The participants were from The Azores Islands, a remote and mostly rural Portuguese region. Using a Structural Equation Model (SEM) and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) approach, we found that greater PA significantly improved their prospects of returning, rather than greater expected monthly income 3 years after graduation. However, these trends were only relevant among young women. Our findings indicate the need to strengthen youth civic engagement policies, as well as new youth employment packages that diversify the transition from education to the labor market or better match local resources with more promising and rewarding careers.

Highlights

  • Kurt Lewin (1939) defined individual existence as a function of geography, social surroundings and time

  • Equation Model (SEM) and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) approach, we found that greater Place Attachment (PA) significantly improved their prospects of returning, rather than greater expected monthly income 3 years after graduation

  • We want to understand the interplay between objective factors underlying mobility, namely socio-economic status, and subjective factors, Place Attachment (PA) and Future Time Perspective (FTP), and how they connect with the returning intentions of university students with a rural background after graduation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kurt Lewin (1939) defined individual existence as a function of geography, social surroundings and time. Space and time perceptions are, drivers of subjectivity shaping the most significant human decisions. Mobility has been a long standing key decision in life trajectory choices. Migrations are influenced by objective factors, such as socio-economic conditions, as well as by subjective factors, including personal perspectives on space and time (Bourdieu, 1984). In a globalized and densely interconnected society, settling in cities has become an imperative (Farrugia, 2016)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.