Abstract

As opposed to objective definitions in soil physics, the subjective term “soil physical quality” is increasingly found in publications in the soil physics area. A supposed indicator of soil physical quality that has been the focus of attention, especially in the Brazilian literature, is the Least Limiting Water Range (RLL), translated in Portuguese as "Intervalo Hídrico Ótimo" or IHO. In this paper the four limiting water contents that define RLLare discussed in the light of objectively determinable soil physical properties, pointing to inconsistencies in the RLLdefinition and calculation. It also discusses the interpretation of RLL as an indicator of crop productivity or soil physical quality, showing its inability to consider common phenological and pedological boundary conditions. It is shown that so-called “critical densities” found by the RLL through a commonly applied calculation method are questionable. Considering the availability of robust models for agronomy, ecology, hydrology, meteorology and other related areas, the attractiveness of RLL as an indicator to Brazilian soil physicists is not related to its (never proven) effectiveness, but rather to the simplicity with which it is dealt. Determining the respective limiting contents in a simplified manner, relegating the study or concern on the actual functioning of the system to a lower priority, goes against scientific construction and systemic understanding. This study suggests a realignment of the research in soil physics in Brazil with scientific precepts, towards mechanistic soil physics, to replace the currently predominant search for empirical correlations below the state of the art of soil physics.

Highlights

  • Soil physics is the branch of soil science that deals with soil physical properties and processes

  • A supposed indicator of soil physical quality that has been the focus of attention, especially in the Brazilian literature, is the Least Limiting Water Range (RLL), translated in Portuguese as "Intervalo Hídrico Ótimo" or IHO

  • Taking into account that the parameters included in the calculation of RLL can represent drought stress and anoxic stress, and include mechanical root growth stress, the most likely explanation for the observed low correlation is the simple way by which the parameters are related in RLL as well as inaccuracies in their calibration

Read more

Summary

REVISÃO DE LITERATURA

Beyond the “Least Limiting Water Range”: RETHINKING SOIL PHYSICS Research in Brazil(1). (1) A version of this text in Portuguese may be obtained with the corresponding author. (2) Universidade de São Paulo, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Laboratório de Física do Solo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil. (3) Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. (1) A version of this text in Portuguese may be obtained with the corresponding author. (2) Universidade de São Paulo, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Laboratório de Física do Solo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil. (3) Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Solos, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. *Corresponding author

Quirijn de Jong van Lier and Paulo Ivonir Gubiani
INTRODUCTION
Anoxic stress
Limiting contents versus physical properties
The limiting water content for proper aeration versus gas diffusion
Problems and mistakes in interpreting the RLL
Phenological boundary conditions and their consequences for the RLL
Pedological boundary conditions and their consequences for the RLL
Critical density
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call