Beyond the fractures: A comprehensive Comparative analysis of Affordable and Accessible laboratory parameters and their coefficients for prediction and Swift confirmation of pulmonary embolism in high-risk orthopedic patients

Abstract

BackgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) poses a significant challenge in diagnosis and treatment, particularly in high-risk patient populations such as those hospitalized for orthopedic reasons. This study explores the predictive and diagnostic potential of laboratory parameters in identifying PE among orthopedic patients. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine whether selected (inexpensive and readily available) laboratory parameters and their coefficients can be used to diagnose pulmonary embolism and whether they are applicable in predicting its occurrence. Material and methodsSelected laboratory parameters were determined twice in 276 hospitalized orthopedic patients with suspected PE: PLT, MPV, NEU, LYM, D-dimer, troponin I, age-adjusted D-dimer and their coefficients. Depending on the angio-CT results, patients were divided into groups. Selected popular laboratory coefficients were calculated and statistically analyzed. Optimal cutoff points were determined for the above laboratory tests and ROC curves were plotted. ResultsD-dimer/troponin I [p = 0.008], D-dimer [p = 0.001], age-adjusted D-dimer [p = 0.007], NLR/D-dimer [p = 0.005] and PLR [p = 0.021] are statistically significant predictors of PE. D-dimer/troponin I [p < 0.001], troponin I [p = 0.005] and age-adjusted D-dimer [p = 0.001] correlated with the diagnosis of PE after the onset of clinical symptoms. ConclusionsIn the context of orthopedic patients, cost-effective laboratory parameters, particularly the D-dimer/troponin I ratio and age-adjusted D-dimer, exhibit considerable potential in predicting and diagnosing PE. These findings suggest that combining readily available laboratory tests with clinical observation can offer a viable and cost-effective diagnostic alternative, especially in resource-constrained settings. Further studies with larger and diverse patient populations are recommended to validate these results.