Abstract

Sustainability consideration in designing, constructing, and operating civil infrastructure requires substantive action and yet progress is slow. This research examines the impact third-party infrastructure sustainability rating tools—specifically CEEQUAL, Envision, Greenroads, and Infrastructure Sustainability—have beyond individual project certification and considers their role in driving wider industry change. In this empirical study, engineering and sustainability professionals (n = 63) assess and describe their experience in using rating tools outside of formal certification and also the impact of tool use on their own practice and the practices of their home organizations. The study found that 77% of experienced users and 59% of infrastructure owners used the tools for purposes other than formal project certification. The research attests that rating tool use and indeed their very existence has a strong influence on sustainability awareness and practice within the infrastructure industry, providing interpretation of sustainability matters in ways that resonate with industry norms. The rating tools impact on individuals and their professional and personal practice, on the policies and practices of infrastructure-related organizations, and more widely on other industry stakeholders. The findings can be used to increase the value gained from sustainability rating tool use and to better understand the role such tools play in creating cultural change within the industry.

Highlights

  • Sustainability rating tools such as Envision and CEEQUAL are intended to improve the environmental, social, and economic outcomes from the construction and operation of physical infrastructure

  • Sustainability rating tools for civil infrastructure are one response from industry to bridging the current gap, and in this study, we investigate the impact of the infrastructure sustainability rating tools beyond individual projects, by analyzing non-certified tool use and examining how tool use influences individual and organizational practice

  • The impacts of the infrastructure sustainability rating tools are not limited to the projects that undergo rating and certification but extend across the infrastructure industry via informal use and influence at an individual, organizational, and industry level (Figure 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainability rating tools such as Envision and CEEQUAL are intended to improve the environmental, social, and economic outcomes from the construction and operation of physical infrastructure. Infrastructure sustainability rating tools function in a similar way to their building counterparts and are used to assess and certify project and asset performance against a range of sustainability criteria including resource use, ecology, stakeholder involvement, community impacts, climate change and resilience, land use, and urban design. These tools are usually specified by infrastructure owners, for example, transport agencies and territorial authorities, and applied to capital projects or infrastructure assets by project teams (design and construction engineers and sustainability advisors) [26]. By the end of 2016, CEEQUAL had been used to certify more than 360 projects with a further 250 registered for certification; Envision had been used to certify 25 projects with a further 37 registered for certification; Infrastructure Sustainability had been used to certify 28 projects with a further 67 registered for certification; and Greenroads had been used to certify 37 projects with a further 30 registered for certification (Griffiths, unpublished)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call