Abstract
For several decades, the concerted or stepwise character of the mechanism of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction has been one of the most debated issues in the field of organic chemistry. The significance of this problem is due to the fact that in a catalyst-free 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, when the mechanism switches from concerted to stepwise, the stereospecificity is lost and thus unwanted stereoisomers may emerge. The first proposals about the mechanism of the 1,3-dipolar reaction were due to Huisgen (concerted model) and subsequently by Firestone (two-step diradical channel) in the 1960s. After a decade of debate, most researchers accepted the concerted model for the reaction, but during these years, researchers reported some examples of the stepwise mechanism for catalyst-free 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions. This review attempts to find a number of factors that could influence the reaction channels and switch the mechanism from concerted to stepwise, or vice versa.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
