Abstract
Internationally there is a desire to transition farming systems towards more sustainable production in response to global and local social and environmental challenges. This transition has often been linked with a movement towards ‘sustainable intensification’ which, although having advantages, has raised questions about a lack of attention to, for example, social and ethical consideration of food and fibre production. Whilst there is general consensus that a transition is required, what is much less clear is what transitioned agricultural sectors would look like in terms of land-use configurations and how such a change can be achieved. Using New Zealand as an example, this paper provides some initial views on what such a reconfiguration may entail. The paper identifies and assesses a range of possible alternative land use configurations that, in general, lead to landscape/regional diversification. The importance of incorporating new high value low intensity (niche) systems into the landscape is highlighted. Development of these niches to achieve scale is shown to be key to the transition process. The joint role of the private (through markets) and public (through policy) sectors in driving the transition is highlighted.
Highlights
IntroductionTransitioning farming methods away from increased productivity towards sustainable production is increasingly desirable [1,2,3,4,5]
Introduction and BackgroundInternationally, transitioning farming methods away from increased productivity towards sustainable production is increasingly desirable [1,2,3,4,5]
Whilst a lot is known about land-use in New Zealand, less has been studied about the systems that occupy this land
Summary
Transitioning farming methods away from increased productivity towards sustainable production is increasingly desirable [1,2,3,4,5] This transition generally involves movement towards ‘sustainable intensification’ which whilst having some advantages (including increased yields and food productivity per area [6]) has recognized drawbacks including a lack of attention to social and ethical aspects of food and fibre production and security [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Kohler [19] notes that regimes exist not to innovate, but to bring about system optimisation and efficiencies This system change via the niche is due to both the ability to exploit betterperforming technology, and to offer society new types of behaviour and more sustainable consumption. It may be argued that to remain competitive, the primary sector has followed established pathways
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.