Abstract

Growing concern about particulate matter (PM2.5) pressures Korea to reduce the health risks associated with its high dependency on fossil fuels. The Korean economy relies heavily on large thermal power plants—a major source of PM2.5 emissions. Although air quality regulations can negatively impact local economies, the Korean government announced two strict air quality mitigation policies in 2019. We develop a regional static computable general equilibrium model to simulate the economic and environmental impacts of these polices under alternative hypothetical scenarios. We separate two regions, Chungcheongnam-do, the most polluted region, and the rest of the country, in our model. As policy options, we introduce a regional development tax and a tradable market for PM emission permits, similar to an air pollution tax and a carbon permits market, respectively. The results show that allowing higher tax rates and a tradable permits market gives the optimal combination, with the PM2.5 emissions reduced by 2.35% without sacrificing economic growth. Since alternative options present, for example, a 0.04% loss of gross domestic product to reduce PM emissions by the same amount, our results here may present a new policy paradigm for managing air pollutants such as PM2.5.

Highlights

  • Among the adverse effects of economic growth, air quality degradation driven by fossil fuel energy sources represents a mitigation target in most countries

  • We developed a single-country regional static computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to analyze the economic effects associated with policies regulating air quality

  • Based on a traditional neoclassical CGE model [23], a single-country economy is divided into two parts, the CN and the remaining Korean provinces (RP), to compare the regional effects using a regional input–output table

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the adverse effects of economic growth, air quality degradation driven by fossil fuel energy sources represents a mitigation target in most countries. Air pollutants from fossil fuel power generation such as sulfur dioxide (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) caused approximately 3.7 million deaths worldwide in 2012, the largest single environmental health risk [1]. Most economic activities in many countries rely heavily on fossil fuel energy sources, making air pollution all but inevitable. Ambient particulate matter such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) causes the most substantial health risks, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [2]. Epidemiological studies elaborate a robust relationship between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and premature mortality. In an example going back decades, a dramatic increase in particulate matter in

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call