Abstract
AbstractInstitutions have a central role in climate change governance. But while there is a flourishing literature on institutions' formal rules, processes, and organizational forms, scholars lament a relative lack of attention to institutions' informal side; their cultures. It is important to study institutions' cultures because it is through culture that people relate to institutional norms and rules in taking climate action. This review uncovers what work has been done on institutional cultures and climate change, discerns common themes around which this scholarship coheres, and advances and argument for why institutional cultures matter. We employed a systematic literature review to assemble a set of 54 articles with a shared concern for how climate change and institutional cultures concurrently affect each other. The articles provided evidence of a nascent field, emerging over the past 5–10 years and fragmented across literatures. This field draws on diverse concepts of institutionalism for revealing quite different expressions of culture, and is mostly grounded in empirical studies. These disparate studies compellingly demonstrate, from different perspectives, that institutional cultures do indeed matter for implementing climate governance. Indeed, the articles converge in providing empirical evidence of eight key sites of interaction between climate change and institutional cultures: worldviews, values, logics, gender, risk acceptance, objects, power, and relationality. These eight sites are important foci for examining and effecting changes to institutions and their cultures; showing how institutional cultures shape responses to climate change, and how climate change shapes institutional cultures.This article is categorized under: The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Highlights
Institutions have long been considered central for governing societies' responses to climate change (Adger et al, 2005; Moser & Boykoff, 2013), and are most often discussed as the “rules of the game” prescribing interaction and action in different social spheres; from local government to newspapers and churches (North, 1990; Ostrom, 2005)
Cultures are important because they drive the interpretation of what climate change means for an institution and how people conceive of formally responding; it is through culture that “people relate to institutional norms and rules.”
We were interested in how an institution's culture mediates the way climate change influences that institution, and at the same time, how an institution can influence understanding of or responses to climate change. This mutual influence we described as dynamic “interaction”, interplay or co-production, where dynamism relates to temporalities
Summary
Scott Bremer1 | Bruce Glavovic2 | Simon Meisch1,3 | Paul Schneider2 | Arjan Wardekker.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.