Abstract
n/a
Highlights
When talking about scientific ethics, we usually focus on plagiarism and scientific fraud
Ádám Kun describes a culture of research in academia that is impact/ citations-obsessed—a culture of research, which creates a fertile soil for scientific misconduct to flourish
If you are monitoring RetractionWatch [3], a Web site that reports articles retracted from scientific journals, you may have wondered who created the retraction notices
Summary
When talking about scientific ethics, we usually focus on plagiarism and scientific fraud. Scientific misconduct may be very subtle (like, not citing peer’s articles), but sometimes it is more obvious (fabricating results). Scientific ethics, though, is much more than plagiarism and fabrication of data. The authors of the articles included in this issue have looked at scientific ethics from a broader perspective.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
