Abstract
Abstract By examining the work of David Coffey, a secular priest of the Archdiocese of Sydney (Australia), we continue to follow the development of the same themes within the particular trajectory of neoscholasticism that was reviewed in the previous two chapters. We have attempted to discern a pattern in the work of Scheeben, Mersch, de la Taille, Donnelly, and Rabner, which when taken collectively provide the necessary building blocks for the construction of Spirit-christology within the broad scholastic tradition of Roman Catholic theology and one that is compatible with the pneumatological christology of the Orthodox tradition. Coffey, for his part, accepts the basic correctness of these theologians ” innovations in the theology of grace and pneumatology, especially as these point to the priority of the Holy Spirit in the divine inhabitation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
