Abstract

The last few years have seen increasing research interest in moods and atmospheres. While this trend has been accompanied by growing interest in the history of the word Stimmung in other disciplines, this has not yet been the case within philosophy. Against this background, this paper offers a conceptual history of the word Stimmung, focusing on the period from Kant to Heidegger, as this period is, presumably, less known to researchers working with notions like mood, attunement or atmosphere today. Thus, considering this period might provide conceptual resources not yet considered in current debate. Stimmung has the remarkable feature of encompassing the entire semantic field of mood and atmosphere, insofar as both subjects and objects can literally be in Stimmung. Stimmung might refer to the state or condition of being attuned, which is understood as a dispositional state, as well as the process or act of attuning, which includes self-activating and foreign-determined forms of attuning. The word was first used for the tuning of musical instruments, but was quickly transferred to the fields of aesthetics, psychology, and physiology. This paper will focus on the contrast between the psychological canonization of Stimmung as a type of mental state, and the use of Stimmung as an untranslatable, irreducible metaphor with unique semantic force allowing for original theorizing.

Highlights

  • This paper offers an investigation into the conceptual history of the word Stimmung

  • This investigation is conducted against the background of increasing research interest in moods and atmospheres

  • Stimmung has the remarkable feature of encompassing the entire semantic field of mood and atmosphere, insofar as both subjects and objects can literally be in Stimmung

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper offers an investigation into the conceptual history of the word Stimmung. This investigation is conducted against the background of increasing research interest in moods and atmospheres. While in other disciplines this trend has been accompanied by growing interest in the word Stimmung and its history, this has not yet been the case within philosophy. This can be identified as a lacuna in current debates, which do not pay sufficient attention to the history and semantic content of their core concepts. This paper focuses on the period up until Heidegger, as this period is, presumably, less known to researchers working with notions like mood, attunement or atmosphere today Considering this period might provide conceptual resources not yet considered in current debate. Mood, as well as it correlates in German, were from the beginning located in the semantic field of the mind and do not allow for technical applications Derived from this root is the German term Gemüt, which signifies the unity of the powers of the mind and plays a crucial role in eightenth and nineteenth century discourse.. Before I proceed with discussing Kant’s text, let me briefly summarize the core semantic content of the Stimmung metaphor (Welsh 2009a, 48; Wellbery 2003, 707–9): First, the metaphor of Stimmung allows to focus on the state of being attuned (of a musical instrument, the mind, or the nervous system). The subject and object of attuning are the same and we can speak of a self-attunement (Selbststimmung) or selfdetermination (Selbstbestimmung)

Kant’s Introduction of the Stimmung Metaphor
Stimmung as a Lively Metaphor
Psychologizing Stimmung
The Ongoing Potential of the Metaphor
Stimmung as a Resource for an Alternative Ontology
Epilogue
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call