Abstract

Both direct and indirect costs contribute to financial toxicity in prostate cancer. Indirect costs are difficult to assess and quantify and therefore remain understudied. We sought to describe the indirect costs of prostate cancer across risk groups as well as identify any associated sociodemographic factors. Patients with localized prostate cancer were surveyed regarding their indirect costs at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-ups. "Out-of-pocket indirect costs" were defined as costs paid for medication, parking, transportation, meals outside the home, and caregivers. "Imputed indirect costs" were calculated based on hour estimates for traveling time, missed work, additional time spent on work, and additional time dedicated to their care by caregivers. Generalized linear model regressions were performed to evaluate for potential associations between sociodemographic or clinical features with these indirect costs, stratifying by prostate cancer risk group. Four hundred and ninety five localized prostate cancer patients were included in the analysis. Indirect costs ranged from $154.00 to $717.40 for out-of-pocket and $352 to $3389 for imputed per month and did tend to be higher for higher-risk disease. In regression models, sociodemographic factors did not appear to play a strong role in variation in indirect costs. Within a 24-month follow-up period, we observed that indirect costs of localized prostate cancer range from $608 to $4107 per month when including lost productivity costs. Further work must be done to identify what factors contribute to increased indirect costs and financial toxicity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.