Abstract
Scholarship on federalism seems to reside in two worlds: that of U.S. federalism scholars and that of comparative and non-U.S. scholars. There is little evidence of cross-fertilization of research across the two worlds—especially U.S. scholars reading and citing comparative federalism work. This article describes what U.S. scholars are missing and how U.S. scholarship might be enriched from tapping into comparative federalism research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
