Beyond Ether and Chloroform—A Major Breakthrough With Halothane

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of equipment powered by electricity in the operating room increased the risk of fires in the presence of flammable agents such as ether and cyclopropane. Chloroform was associated with cardiac arrhythmias and liver damage. The introduction of halothane in the late 1950s was heralded as a solution to many problems facing the specialty of anesthesia. We explore whether the manufacturer promptly reported halothane's adverse effects to regulatory agencies and practitioners. SourcesWe consulted documents submitted by Ayerst Laboratories to federal authorities through the Freedom of Information Act, promotional advertisements, package inserts, published articles, and textbooks. ResultsTwo major complications associated with the use of halothane, cardiac arrhythmias and the risk of hepatotoxicity, were disclosed by the manufacturer when the drug was first introduced to the US market. Reports appeared timely and complete; there was no apparent attempt to conceal or otherwise downplay these risks. ConclusionThe process of drug discovery and approval for clinical use has always been a lengthy, complex, and extremely expensive undertaking, with only a small minority of compounds receiving approval. The risk of adverse effects or drug interaction directly impacts commercial viability. In the case of halothane, the manufacturer disclosed major adverse effects, and the drug enjoyed decades of popularity until it was replaced by agents with a better drug profile.