Abstract

In contrast to research that treats psychological distance and construal level as the same construct, the current research explores an alternative view that the emotional consequences of psychological distance for judgment and action are distinct from the emotional consequences of abstract thinking. Across four studies, we find evidence suggesting that distance promotes emotional detachment, whereas abstract thinking promotes a focus on positivity. Psychological distance reduces, but abstract thinking enhances, consumers’ willingness to buy desirable products (study 1), interest in social activities (study 2), and donation rates to charity (study 3). Furthermore, although both psychological distance and abstract thinking make aversive experiences feel less painful, psychological distance reduces, while abstract thinking enhances, the pleasure of appetitive experiences (study 4). We discuss how increased specificity regarding when and why the effects of psychological distance and abstract thinking diverge can improve marketing communication strategy and broaden existing theories of psychological distance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.