Abstract
Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.