Abstract

The online sphere allows people to be personally anonymous while simultaneously signaling social identity, e.g., through political network visibility. Twitter users can use a pseudonym but signal fealty to a political party in their profile (e.g., \#MAGA). We explore the interplay of these two dimensions of anonymity on a custom-built social media platform, that allowed us to examine the causal effects of personal and social anonymity on discussion quality. In discussions on gun rights, we find no support for the hypothesis that personal anonymity breeds incivility or lower discussion quality. On the other hand, when personal anonymity is combined with social identity (operationalized as political network visibility), it improves several features linked to discussion quality, i.e., higher rationality and lower incivility. We discuss the mechanisms that might explain the results, and offer recommendations for future experiments about the design of social media platforms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.