Abstract

Objective Aortic dissection is not a rare life-threatening emergency. Undiagnosed and untreated aortic dissection is associated with a high mortality. A review of cases in the hospital may provide a baseline picture to guide clinical decisions. Design Retrospective case review for a period of 3 years and 4 months. Setting District general hospital near the Hong Kong – Shenzhen ‘border’ with 24-hour Accident & Emergency service but without cardiothoracic surgical capability. Population All cases coded as ‘aortic dissection’ in the computerized ‘Clinical Management System’ of the hospital. Main outcome measures Date, sex, age, history of hypertension, presenting symptoms, pulse deficit, chest X-ray findings, pericardial effusion, A&E diagnosis, type of dissection and patient outcome. Results From August 1998 to November 2001, 26 cases of aortic dissection were identified. There were 19 males and 7 females. Age range was 26 to 90 years (mean 65.04 ± SD 15.04, median 66.50, mode 65). In the plain chest X-rays, widened superior mediastinum (>8 cm) was present in 19 patients (73.1%) and pleural effusion in three (11.5%). Pericardial effusion was found in six patients (23.1%). As regard to outcome, 11 were discharged home (42.3%), 14 were transferred to cardiothoracic surgical unit (where two subsequently died) and one died in the hospital. Conclusion The prevalence of aortic dissection may be more common than is generally appreciated by emergency physicians. Owing to its variable clinical presentations mimicking other diseases, the diagnosis of aortic dissection is easily missed. Higher clinical vigilance should be exercised for this potentially deadly condition.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call