Abstract

We discuss how data unbiasing and simple methods such as protein-ligand Interaction FingerPrint (IFP) can overestimate virtual screening performance. We also show that IFP is strongly outperformed by target-specific machine-learning scoring functions, which were not considered in a recent report concluding that simple methods were better than machine-learning scoring functions at virtual screening.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call