Abstract

This paper discusses the concepts of ‘freedom of religion’ and ‘secularism’ in the context of the situation in Macedonia. It argues that State policies to support dominant religion(s) are not in coherence with the Constitution, the principle of equality and secularism, as well as the applicable international human rights standards. Having in mind that R. Macedonia is a secular State and that there is solid non-discrimination legislation in place, it is of interest to investigate whether such policy approaches are discriminatory. Such developments may threaten the principle of secularism, human rights and stability in a fragile multi-ethnic and multi-religious country such as R. of Macedonia.In terms of methodology, this paper primarily focuses on the use of the normative and the empirical method. These methods are especially of use in the part where the existing legal framework in the domestic and international law is analyzed in regard to the various practices challenging the principles of secularism and equality before the law. In addition, this paper also focuses on the various reports in order to discuss and address relevant perceptions to such practices. This article consists of four parts. Introductory remarks are provided in section I. Section II explores the notions of secularism and equality before the law. Section III explores the various institutional practices such as: religious instruction in public schools; building of religious objects with State funding and support; non-registration of religious communities; and practicing religious ceremonies in public institutions. Finally, section IV offers concluding remarks and comments.

Highlights

  • Many States around the world have adopted the principle of secularism, separating the State from religious organizations

  • Certain State practices discussed in this paper represent a challenge to the principle of secularism and equality before the law

  • It has to be noted from the beginning, that in the case of Macedonia as was reported by Special Reporter Jahangi, there is a high level of tolerance and respect by the Government for “religious diversity and freedom of religion or belief’ (Report of the Special Rapporteur Asma Jahangi, 2009, p.4-29)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many States around the world have adopted the principle of secularism, separating the State from religious organizations. Without claiming to provide a conclusive list of examples, such practices, among others include: introduction of religious instruction in public schools; building of religious objects with State funding and support; non-registration of smaller religious communities; and religious ceremonies and practices in public institutions These examples require further analyses as they present violations of the principle of secularism and equality before the law. Other examples include inauguration of new public objects (schools, hospitals, institutions) followed by religious rituals (Zarevska, 2011) In such practices authorities allow interference of one religion and one religious organization in a sphere that belongs to all citizens and is controversial from a legal perspective notwithstanding the principles of equality and secularism

Conclusion
List of References
Findings
Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief to the former Yugoslav
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call