Abstract
Sibling rivalry seems to contradict Hamilton's rule of maximizing inclusive fitness (Hamilton, 1964). However, when critical resources are scarce and the competitors are close kin the individual must weigh the direct versus the indirect components of its inclusive fitness (Mock & Parker, 1997). In facultatively siblicidal species, conflicts arise mainly because of the phenomenon of ‘parental optimism’, in which the parents attempt to raise a larger brood than the average amount of expected resources allow (Lack, 1954; Temme & Charnov, 1987; Mock & Forbes, 1995). If critical resources are low, weaker or subordinate offspring may be killed by a stronger or dominant sibling. Sibling mortality may result from direct physical damage and/or socially enforced starvation (Mock, 1984).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
