Abstract
Social workers increasingly find their practice is impacted by legal concerns. Nowhere has this been more true than in the recovered memory field where several high profile cases have found therapists liable. This article reviews the core issues of the clinical and political debate regarding traumatic amnesia, including repressed memory and delayed recovery of memories. Through an exploration of research and theories on memory, trauma and defenses, and a review of relevant court cases, guidelines are developed for practice. By following an evolving standard of care when working with trauma survivors and exercising caution with therapeutic techniques, clients can be helped and the potential for liability can be lessened.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
