Abstract
Two-generation (2Gen) initiatives—social programs that invest in both children and their caregivers—have been lauded for their potential to improve multigenerational well-being and upward mobility. 2Gen advocates argue that these kinds of social investments likely outperform investment in a single generation, because they should create spillover and multiplier effects that more effectively boost well-being and mobility from poverty. We review empirical research on 2Gen initiatives in education and workforce, parenting, housing, and health. While most 2Gen initiatives either have null effects or have not been rigorously evaluated, there is strong evidence of positive spillover benefits to children when parents access programs that significantly improve family economic resources. We also find evidence of positive effects on both generations when interventions involve intensive home visiting. We conclude with a critique of current 2Gen initiatives, arguing that the focus on family skill building is insufficient to disrupt multigenerational poverty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
