Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

BackgroundTumor characteristics can be prognostically relevant in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This study aimed to determine whether different subtypes of HGSOC, especially the mesenchymal subtype, are associated with overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with HGSOC.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to September 2020. The eligibility criteria were (1) population: patients with HGSOG with molecular subtyping of their tumor, (2) exposure: mesenchymal subtype, (3) non‐exposure: differentiated, immunoreactive, proliferative, and other non‐mesenchymal subtypes, (4) outcome: survival, with hazard ratios (HRs), and (5) English language.ResultsThe mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in OS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.78–2.78, p = 0.238; I 2 = 81.2%, p heterogeneity = 0.005) or all non‐mesenchymal subtypes (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97–2.80, p = 0.063; I 2 = 79.4%, p heterogeneity = 0.008). The mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in PFS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.71–2.00, p = 0.514; I 2 = 71.6%, p heterogeneity = 0.030) but a significant differences was observed when using all non‐mesenchymal subtypes as reference (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.00–2.28, p = 0.049). The results were robust according to the sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsThere are no statistically significant differences in OS between the mesenchymal subtype of HGSOC and other subtypes of HGSOC. Because of statistical power, this meta‐analysis cannot conclude about non‐inferiority, and the relationship between the molecular subtypes and HGSOC prognosis remains controversial. Based on one study, the mesenchymal subtype could have a poorer PFS than the non‐mesenchymal subtypes of HGSOC, but this conclusion requires further evidence.