Better Approximation Algorithms for the Graph Diameter

Abstract

The diameter is a fundamental graph parameter and its computation is necessary in many applications. The fastest known way to compute the diameter exactly is to solve the All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem. In the absence of fast algorithms, attempts were made to seek fast algorithms that approximate the diameter. In a seminal result Aingworth, Chekuri, Indyk and Motwani [SODA'96 and SICOMP'99] designed an algorithm that computes in time an estimate for the diameter D in directed graphs with nonnegative edge weights, such that ⌊⅔ · D⌋ – (M – 1) ≤ ≤ D, where M is the maximum edge weight in the graph. In recent work, Roditty and Vassilevska W. [STOC 13] gave a Las Vegas algorithm that has the same approximation guarantee but improves the (expected) runtime to . Roditty and Vassilevska W. also showed that unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, no (n2−∊) time algorithm for sparse unweighted undirected graphs can achieve an approximation ratio better than . Thus their algorithm is essentially tight for sparse unweighted graphs. For weighted graphs however, the approximation guarantee can be meaningless, as M can be arbitrarily large. In this paper we exhibit two algorithms that achieve a genuine -approximation for the diameter, one running in time, and one running in time. Furthermore, our algorithms are deterministic, and thus we present the first deterministic (2 – ∊)-approximation algorithm for the diameter that takes subquadratic time in sparse graphs. In addition, we address the question of obtaining an additive c-approximation for the diameter, i.e. an estimate such that D – c ≤ ≤ D. An extremely simple time algorithm achieves an additive n∊-approximation; no better results are known. We show that for any ∊ > 0, getting an additive n∊-approximation algorithm for the diameter running in (n2−δ) time for any δ > 2∊ would falsify the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Thus the simple algorithm is probably essentially tight for sparse graphs, and moreover, obtaining a subquadratic time additive c-approximation for any constant c is unlikely. Finally, we consider the problem of computing the eccentricities of all vertices in an undirected graph, i.e. the largest distance from each vertex. Roditty and Vassilevska W. [STOC 13] show that in time, one can compute for each v ∊ V in an undirected graph, an estimate ∊(v) for the eccentricity ∊(v) such that max {R, · ∊(v)} ≤ ∊(v) ≤ min {D, · ∊(v)} where R = minv ∊(v) is the radius of the graph. Here we improve the approximation guarantee by showing that a variant of the same algorithm can achieve estimates ∊′(v) with · ∊(v) ≤ ∊′(v) ≤ ∊(v).