Abstract

Betatron coupling is usually analyzed using either matrix formalism or Hamiltonian perturbation theory. The latter is less exact but provides a better physical insight. In this paper direct relations are derived between the two formalisms. This makes it possible to interpret the matrix approach in terms of resonances, as well as use results of both formalisms indistinctly. An approach to measure the complete coupling matrix and its determinant from turn-by-turn data is presented. Simulations using methodical accelerator design MAD-X, an accelerator design and tracking program, were performed to validate the relations and understand the scope of their application to real accelerators such as the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.

Highlights

  • Betatron coupling in circular accelerators has been widely studied using both matrix formalism and Hamiltonian perturbation theory

  • We propose a method to calculate C21 given C12, C11, and C22 at two locations with an arbitrary phase advance in both normal modes

  • In a coupler free region C matrix is propagated by an arbitrary phase advance in both modes, which is given by [9]

Read more

Summary

Franchi

GSI, Planckstrasse 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany (Received 7 December 2004; published 9 March 2005). Betatron coupling is usually analyzed using either matrix formalism or Hamiltonian perturbation theory. The latter is less exact but provides a better physical insight. In this paper direct relations are derived between the two formalisms. This makes it possible to interpret the matrix approach in terms of resonances, as well as use results of both formalisms indistinctly. An approach to measure the complete coupling matrix and its determinant from turn-by-turn data is presented. Simulations using methodical accelerator design MAD-X, an accelerator design and tracking program, were performed to validate the relations and understand the scope of their application to real accelerators such as the Relativistic Heavy

INTRODUCTION
Resonance driving terms
Matrix formalism
Relating the C matrix to RDTs
Simulations
Dependence on skew quadrupole strengths
Stop-band limits
DETERMINANT OF C
21 C11 cosa sinb C12 cosa sinb
Calculation of skew quadrupole strengths
CONCLUSIONS
C21 in coupler free region
Findings
Skew quadrupole strength from two BPMs
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.