Abstract

BackgroundContinuous monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) was introduced in the 1950s. For correct ICP recordings, the zero-reference point for the external pressure gauge must be placed next to a head anatomical structure. We evaluated different anatomical points as zero reference for the ICP device at different head positions and their relation to brain centre (BC), foramen of Monro (Monro), and brain surface.MethodsPatients referred for neuroimaging due to e.g. headache all having normal 3D MRI scans were selected. Monro, BC, Orbit(O), external auditory meatus (EAM), and orbito-meatal (OM) line were identified and projected to mid-sagittal, or axial images. Each scan was evaluated like lying supine, 45° head elevations, upright, and 45° lateral position. Distances from skin to brain surface, BC, and Monro were measured. All values are presented as mean ± SD and/or range in millimetre. For conversion to mmHg, millimetre was multiplied by 0.074.ResultsTwenty MRI scans were examined. A zero reference at EAM or glabella was ideal at BC when head was strict supine or in the lateral position. At 45° head elevation, an overestimation of the BC-ICP by 4.8 ± 0.8 and in upright 5.6 ± 0.5 mmHg was found, and 45° lateral underestimated ICP-BC by 6.3 ± 1.0 mmHg. Monro was situated 45 ± 5 mm rostral to the mid-OM line and 24 (18–31) mm inferior and 13 (8–17) mm in front of BC. A zero-reference point aligned with the highest point of the head underestimated BC-ICP and Monro-ICP. If the ICP reading was added 5.9 or 6.3 mmHg, respectively, a deviation from BC-ICP was ≤ 1.8 mmHg and Monro-ICP was ≤ 0.9 mmHg in all head positions.ConclusionsEAM and glabella are defined anatomical structures representing BC when strict supine or lateral but with 12 mmHg variation with different head positions used in clinical practice. The OM line follows Monro at head elevation, but not when the head is turned. When the highest external point on the head is used, ICP values at brain surface as well as Monro and BC are underestimated. This underestimation is fairly constant and, when corrected for, provides the most exact ICP reading.

Highlights

  • Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is commonly performed using an intraventricular catheter connected through a fluid-filled system to an external pressure gauge

  • This can be done while placing it at brain midpoint, Origo, or brain centre (BC), at the centre between the foramen of Monro (Monro), or at the surface of the brain

  • We find the foramen Monro to be 45 mm superior to the OM lines midpoint with a mean 78° angle from meatus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is commonly performed using an intraventricular catheter connected through a fluid-filled system to an external pressure gauge. Such a system can be calibrated regularly to the atmospheric air pressure to avoid drift and is commonly regarded as the Bgold standard^ [1]. The pressure transducer is placed outside the head and the gauge level needs to be related to an anatomical structure on the head surface. This can be done while placing it at brain midpoint, Origo, or brain centre (BC), at the centre between the foramen of Monro (Monro), or at the surface of the brain. We evaluated different anatomical points as zero reference for the ICP device at different head positions and their relation to brain centre (BC), foramen of Monro (Monro), and brain surface

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.