(Best Poster Award - 1st Place) Characterisation of the Li Metal|Electrolyte Interface of PEO-Based SPEs with Borate Salts, Using in Situ Li Deposition PES Measurements Aided by AIMD Simulations

Abstract

Lithium metal and anode-free batteries has the potential to increase the energy density and specific energy of the batteries drastically. However, when regular electrolyte materials are tried for these concepts they are plagued with problems due to degradation of the electrolyte at the interface and processes like dendrite formation which leads to poor capacity retention.[1] A strategy to mitigate these problems is to use Solid Polymer Electrolytes (SPEs), as these have better stability towards lithium metal. In order to find appropriate chemistries to use in SPE-based cells it is important to investigate and understand their anode interface, as this is where the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) is created from the degradation products during cycling.This work investigates three polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based SPEs, using lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB), and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) as the lithium conducting salts. The interfaces of these SPEs (PEO:LiBF4, PEO:LiBOB, and PEO:LiDFOB) was studied using Photo-Electron Spectroscopy (PES) with in situ lithium deposition, where lithium atoms are evaporated on top of the SPE film. The analysis of the core-level spectra before and after lithium deposition is compared to Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the interface, where lithium atoms are gradually added during the simulation. These experimental and theoretical methods are meant to mimic the electrochemical plating of lithium at the lithium|SPE interface during charging of a lithium metal or anode-less cell.The interfaces of PEO:LiBOB and PEO:LiBF4 show, among other compounds, polyethylene as a breakdown product at the interface. PEO:LiDFOB shows a much lesser degree of degradation compared to the other two systems. The degradation layer is however still effective at protecting the SPE from further breakdown, as PEO:LiDFOB has a relatively high capacity retention compared to PEO:LiBF4 and PEO:LiBOB. Suggested is that the LiF provides a better electrochemical stability, while the boron and oxalate breakdown products provides a higher mechanical stability at the interface.[1] Huang WZ, Zhao CZ, Wu P, Yuan H, Feng WE, Liu ZY, Lu Y, Sun S, Fu ZH, Hu JK, Yang SJ. Anode‐Free Solid‐State Lithium Batteries: A Review. Advanced Energy Materials. 2022 Jul;12(26):2201044. Figure 1