Abstract

Delayed bleeding (DB) is a possible adverse event following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The BEST-J score was created as a risk prediction model for DB following gastric ESD, but is yet to be validated in Western populations. We aimed to validate the BEST-J score on a European sample and to perform a subgroup analysis according to histological classification. Retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing gastric ESD on a European Endoscopic Unit. DB was defined as hemorrhage with clinical symptoms and confirmed by emergency endoscopy from the time of completion to 28days after ESD. BEST-J score was calculated in each patient and confronted with the outcome (DB). Final sample included 161 patients. From these, 10 (6.2%) presented DB following ESD, with a median time to bleeding of 7days (IQR 6.8). BEST-J score presented an excellent accuracy predicting DB in our sample, with an AUC = 0.907 (95%CI 0.801-1.000; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by histological classification proved that the discriminative power was still excellent for each grade: low-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.970 (p < 0.001); high-grade dysplasia-AUC = 0.874 (p < 0.001); early gastric cancer-AUC = 0.881 (p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value to predict DB was a BEST-J score ≥ 3, which matches the cut-off value for high-risk of bleeding in the original investigation. The BEST-J score still presents excellent accuracy in risk stratification for post-ESD bleeding in European individuals. Thus, this score may help to guide which patients benefit the most from prophylactic therapies following gastric ESD in this setting.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call