Abstract

Oceanic islands can be relatively isolated from overfishing and pollution sources, but they are often extremely vulnerable to climate and anthropogenic stress due to their small size and unique assemblages that may rely on a limited larval supply for replenishment. Vulnerability may be especially high when these islands bear permanent human populations or are subjected to regular or intermittent fishing. Since the late 1970's, Brazil has been establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) around its four oceanic island groups, which concentrate high endemism levels and are considered peripheral outposts of the Brazilian Biogeographic Province. In 2018, the Brazilian legally marine protected area increased >10-fold, but most of the ~1,000,000 km2 of MPAs around Brazil's oceanic islands are still unknown and unprotected. Here, we provide the first detailed quantitative baseline of benthic reef assemblages, including shallow and mesophotic zones, of the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (FNA). The archipelago is partially protected as a no-take MPA and recognized by the UNESCO as a World Heritage Site, but also represents the only Brazilian oceanic island with a large permanent human population (3,000 people), mass tourism (up to 90,000 people per year) and a permanent small-scale fishing community. The influence of depth, wave exposure, and distance from the island and shelf edge on the structure of benthic assemblages was assessed from benthic photoquadrats obtained in 12 sites distributed in the lee and windward shores of the archipelago. Unique assemblages and discriminating species were identified using Multivariate Regression Trees, and environmental drivers of dominant assemblages’ components were evaluated using Boosted Regression Trees. A total of 128 benthic taxa were recorded and 5 distinct assemblages were identified. Distance to the insular slope, depth and exposure were the main drivers of assemblages’ differentiation. Our results represent an important baseline for evaluating changes in benthic assemblages due to increased local and global stressors.

Highlights

  • The Brazilian Biogeographic Province (BBP) is a secondary biodiversity centre in the Atlantic Ocean that extends along the eastern South American margin from the Amazon mouth (04 ̊N) south to Santa Catarina (29 ̊S) [1]

  • The ecological relevance of these oceanic islands motivated the declaration of no-take marine protected areas in Rocas Atoll (ROA) (1978, 35,186.41 km2) and Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (FNA) (1988, 10,929.47km2), as well as a multiple-use MPA in FNA, ROA and St. Paul’s Archipelago (SPSPA) (1986, 154,409.03km2)

  • In 2018, multiple-use MPA (muMPA) and no-take marine protected areas (ntMPA) were declared in SPSPA (400,000 and 40,000 km2, respectively) and Trindade/Martin Vaz Archipelago (TMVA) (400,000 and 60,000 km2), this latter covering the adjacent Columbia Seamount

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Brazilian Biogeographic Province (BBP) is a secondary biodiversity centre in the Atlantic Ocean that extends along the eastern South American margin from the Amazon mouth (04 ̊N) south to Santa Catarina (29 ̊S) [1]. The ecological relevance of these oceanic islands motivated the declaration of no-take marine protected areas (ntMPA) in ROA (1978, 35,186.41 km2) and FNA (1988, 10,929.47km2), as well as a multiple-use MPA (muMPA) in FNA, ROA and SPSPA (1986, 154,409.03km). The MPAs around Brazil’s oceanic archipelagos cover 809,429.4 km under multiple-use and 116,418.5 km under no-take regimes, but most of their areas is below 100 m depth and remains to be characterized even in terms of bottom type and oceanographic forcing [3]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.