Abstract

Introduction: Benign oesophageal strictures are defined as narrowing of the oesophageal lumen not related to neoplastic pathology. They are frequently encountered during endoscopic practice and are often responsible for a reduction in the quality of life of patients due to the appearance of dysphagia. In sub-Saharan Africa, little data are available on these benign esophageal strictures. The objective of our study was to determine the sociodemographic, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of benign oesophageal strictures in a digestive endoscopy centre in Senegal. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study analysing reports of upper GI endoscopies performed between January 2015 and December 2017 in a hospital in Senegal. Reports that concluded to have non-neoplastic oesophageal stenosis were collated. Sociodemographic data, indications for and results of endoscopy, and therapeutic modalities were collected. These data were analysed using the Sphinx version 5 software. Results: We collected 101 cases of benign oesophageal stenosis, representing a prevalence of 2.1% in the endoscopy centre. The mean age of the patients was 34 years (range 2 and 83 years) with a median of 37.9 years. There was a female predominance with a sex ratio of 0.38 (73 females). Dysphagia, the main symptom, was present in 87 patients (86.1% of cases) with a Dysphagia score greater than or equal to 2 in 51 patients (50.5%). The average duration of this dysphagia, excluding caustic stenosis, was 4 years (extremes 1 and 15 years). Endoscopy revealed simple stenosis in 76 cases (75.2% of cases). A membranous ring of the cervical oesophagus, suggestive of the Plummer-Vinson syndrome ring, was found in 60 patients (59.4% of cases) and was the primary cause; other aetiologies were dominated by caustic stenosis (19 cases), Schatzki rings (8 cases) and peptic stenosis (4 cases). Endoscopic dilatation was performed in 90 patients (89.1% of cases) with Savary Gilliard bougies (87 cases) and hydrostatic balloons (3 cases). The average number of dilatation sessions was 1.69. In 10 patients (11.1%), refractory stenosis was observed. This stenosis could be resolved after further dilatation in 8 cases before the 8th session. In 2 patients, dilatation failed. Conclusion: Benign oesophageal strictures in our digestive endoscopy centre in Senegal mainly affect young adults, with a predominance of women. Diagnosis is often late. Cervical oesophageal rings in the context of Plummer-Vinson syndrome are the main cause. Oesophageal dilatation with bougies is of great therapeutic value.

Highlights

  • Benign oesophageal strictures are defined as narrowing of the oesophageal lumen not related to neoplastic pathology

  • Jan. 20, 2022 suggestive of the Plummer-Vinson syndrome ring, was found in 60 patients (59.4% of cases) and was the primary cause; other aetiologies were dominated by caustic stenosis (19 cases), Schatzki rings (8 cases) and peptic stenosis (4 cases)

  • Oesophageal dilatation with bougies is of great therapeutic value

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Benign oesophageal strictures are defined as narrowing of the oesophageal lumen not related to neoplastic pathology They are frequently encountered during endoscopic practice and are often responsible for a reduction in the quality of life of patients due to the appearance of dysphagia. The objective of our study was to determine the sociodemographic, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of benign oesophageal strictures in a digestive endoscopy centre in Senegal. Benign oesophageal strictures are defined as narrowing of the oesophageal lumen not directly related to neoplastic pathology Their prevalence is not well defined but they are frequently encountered during endoscopic practice [1] and are often responsible for an alteration in the qualitý of life of patients. In Africa, in sub-Saharan Africa, patchy studies have shown a higher frequency of Plummer-Vinson syndrome and caustic stenosis, probably related to poor socio-demographic and economic conditions [2] [3].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call