Benefits of transport subsidisation: Comparing findings from a customer perception survey and Most Significant Change Technique interviews

Babette Rabie,Adéle Burger

doi:10.4102/aej.v7i1.371

Abstract

Background: An evaluation of a transport subsidisation programme in the Western Cape, South Africa, was undertaken to capture the outcomes and benefits of the service from the perspective of the bus user. Objectives: The objective of this article was to compare the findings from the adopted parallel mixed-methods design that included a perception survey and the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique. The article presented the advantages of each approach and reflected on the benefits and challenges in applying the MSC technique. Method: Data on the intended outcomes of the Provincial Transport Operations Grant programme were collected from 458 commuters on four bus routes through a structured close-ended questionnaire. The MSC technique was applied to collect 69 stories of change that captured changes regarded as most significant by beneficiaries of the public transport subsidy. Results: It was found that the survey better captured the intended and predetermined objectives of the programme, while the large response group allowed for comparisons and cross-tabulations. The MSC interviews better captured the real-life experience of participants and identified the benefits most valued by commuters, including outcomes not specifically anticipated by the programme. It also served to clarify contradicting responses or ratings on the closed-ended questionnaire and informed further bivariate analysis of the structured questionnaire data. Conclusion: To maximise benefits from the MSC technique, sufficient time is needed to solicit value responses from respondents, while decision-makers should allow time for multiple iterations and discussions at different levels of the hierarchy.

Highlights

An evaluation of a transport subsidisation programme in the Western Cape, South Africa, was undertaken to capture the outcomes and benefits of the service from the perspective of the bus user
Low-density areas in cities make transport networks extremely inefficient, resulting in high transport costs and long commuting hours, according to the Government Technical Advisory Centre (Republic of South Africa 2013:1), which has determined that ‘[t]he higher costs, combined with affordability constraints, mean that passenger fares tend to cover a smaller proportion of the operating costs of public transport in South African cities’
In comparing the data obtained through the structured questionnaire versus the Most Significant Change (MSC) interviews, the structured questionnaire was better suited to explore the intended benefits of the programme against predefined programme objectives, as well as comparisons between routes

Summary

Introduction

An evaluation of a transport subsidisation programme in the Western Cape, South Africa, was undertaken to capture the outcomes and benefits of the service from the perspective of the bus user. Government spent nearly R140 billion on public transport subsidies in major cities between 2012/2013 and 2016/2017 (Republic of South Africa 2013). Subsidisation is mostly through the conditional Public Transport Operations Grant (PTOG) that ‘subsidise public transport services in poor communities making these services accessible and affordable’ (Republic of South Africa 2017:112). The Western Cape Department of Transport and Public Works (DTPW) ‘is responsible for the management and administration of road-based subsidised public transport and the associated PTOG allocation’ (Western Cape Government 2017a:52).

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion