Abstract

Livestock production may improve nutritional outcomes of pregnant women and children by increasing household income, availability of nutrient-dense foods, and women's empowerment. Nevertheless, the relationship is complex, and the nutritional status of children may be impaired by presence of or proximity to livestock and their pathogens. In this paper, we review the benefits and risks of livestock production on child nutrition. Evidence supports the nutritional benefits of livestock farming through income, production, and women's empowerment. Increasing animal source food consumption requires a combination of efforts, including improved animal management so that herd size is adequate to meet household income needs and consumption and addressing sociocultural and gendered norms. Evidence supports the inclusion of behavior change communication strategies into livestock production interventions to facilitate the sustainability of nutritional benefits over time, particularly interventions that engage women and foster dimensions of women's empowerment. In evaluating the risks of livestock production, evidence indicates that a broad range of enteric pathogens may chronically infect the intestines of children and, in combination with dietary deficits, may cause environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), a chronic inflammation of the gut. Some of the most important pathogens associated with EED are zoonotic in nature with livestock as their main reservoir. Very few studies have aimed to understand which livestock species contribute most to colonization with these pathogens, or how to reduce transmission. Control at the point of exposure has been investigated in a few studies, but much less effort has been spent on improving animal husbandry practices, which may have additional benefits. There is an urgent need for dedicated and long-term research to understand which livestock species contribute most to exposure of young children to zoonotic enteric pathogens, to test the potential of a wide range of intervention methods, to assess their effectiveness in randomized trials, and to assure their broad adaptation and sustainability. This review highlights the benefits and risks of livestock production on child nutrition. In addition to identifying research gaps, findings support inclusion of poor gut health as an immediate determinant of child undernutrition, expanding the established UNICEF framework which includes only inadequate diet and disease.

Highlights

  • Undernutrition underlies nearly half of mortality of children under five (CU5) [1]

  • Production Of the 145 records included, 24 reported results from interventions that investigated the impact of a livestock intervention on animal source foods (ASF) consumption and/or dietary intake of children and/or households

  • Of the nine studies that measured child ASF consumption, a significant increase in child ASF consumption from baseline to endline was reported in one study [54]; significant increases in child ASF consumption among intervention compared to control households were reported in five studies [55,56,57,58,59]; two studies found no significant differences [60, 61]; and one study did not report significance [62]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Undernutrition underlies nearly half of mortality of children under five (CU5) [1]. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), agriculture has been linked to improved child nutrition outcomes through three primary pathways: food production, income, and women’s empowerment [10]. These pathways can be explored within the UNICEF framework to understand how small-scale (smallholder) livestock production, which promotes the potential to produce nutrient dense, high value animal source foods (ASF) and enhance socio-economic well-being [11, 12], can affect child nutritional outcomes. In addition to production and income, women’s empowerment serves as a pathway from agriculture to improved child nutrition. Women who earn more, have greater control over income and other financial resources, and have more decision-making power are more likely to ensure better household health and nutrition [23,24,25,26]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call