Abstract

In the last few years, numerous approaches have been introduced for supporting design engineers in developing more sustainable products. However, so far, these efforts have not led to the establishment of a commonly acknowledged standard methodology for Sustainable Product Development (SPD). This brings into question the relevance of developing new methods and calls for more efforts in testing the available ones. This article provides a reflection about the benefits and obstacles of applying existing SPD approaches to a real product development project. It reports the results of a project aimed at developing a new mobility solution under the constraints of sustainability-related targets. This project has led to the development of a new pedelec concept, focusing on the substitution of small passenger cars with the help of three SPD methods – Design for Sustainability Guidelines, Product Sustainability Index, and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. These methods have proved to be generally beneficial, thanks to a combination of qualitative and quantitative perspectives. However, the multitude of criteria offered by the methods put forth difficulties in evaluating which sustainability aspects are relevant and therefore lead to higher effort for information retrieval analysis and decision processes. Furthermore, the methods still lack an integrated perspective on the product, the corresponding services and the overarching system.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn the last few decades, the scientific community has eagerly been trying to develop systematic methods to enable engineers to create sustainable products – that is,

  • In the last few decades, the scientific community has eagerly been trying to develop systematic methods to enable engineers to create sustainable products – that is,‘discrete manufactured products that, in fulfilling their functionality over their entire life cycle, cause a manageable amount of impacts on the environment while delivering economic and societal value’ (Bonvoisin, Stark & Seliger 2017)

  • The Design for Sustainability Strategies (DSS) was chosen as it is based on the UNEP Ecodesign Checklist (Brezet et al 1997) which is already widely recognized in the field of Ecodesign

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last few decades, the scientific community has eagerly been trying to develop systematic methods to enable engineers to create sustainable products – that is,. ‘discrete manufactured products that, in fulfilling their functionality over their entire life cycle, cause a manageable amount of impacts on the environment while delivering economic and societal value’ (Bonvoisin, Stark & Seliger 2017). Pigosso (2012) has identified 106 different approaches, ranging from simple guidelines to complex assessment methods, such as Life Cycle. Due to the multitude of available methods, Ernzer & Birkhofer (2002) state that the difficulty no longer lies in the development of further design methods, but rather in the selection of those methods that can be applied efficiently to a specific situation. As a matter of fact, the existing methodological support for sustainable product development (SPD) is often criticized for being poorly integrated into the product development process (Knight & Jenkins 2009; Rosen & Kishawy 2012)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call