Abstract

PurposeWe sought to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of using video-based scenarios in Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) to assess candidate’s empathic abilities by investigating candidate perceptions and the acceptability, fairness, reliability, and validity of the test.MethodsThe study sample was candidates for admission interviews held in the MMI format at a medical school in South Korea. In this six-station MMI, one station included a 2-min video clip of a patient-doctor communication scenario to assess candidate emphatic abilities, whereas paper-based scenarios were used in the other stations. Candidate’s perceptions and acceptability of using the video-based scenario in the empathy station were examined using a 41-item post-MMI questionnaire. Fairness of the test was assessed by means of differences in candidate perceptions and performance across different demographics or backgrounds. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relationship of candidate performances in the empathy station with those in other stations. The G-coefficient was analyzed to estimate the reliability of the test.ResultsEighty-two questionnaires were returned, a 97.6% response rate. Candidates showed overall positive perceptions of the video-based scenario and they found it authentic and interesting. The test was fair as there were no differences in candidates’ perceptions of the patient-doctor relationship presented in the video clip and neither in their performance nor in their perceived difficulty of the station across demographics or backgrounds. Construct validity was established as candidate performance in the empathy station was not associated with that of any other stations. The G-coefficient was 0.74.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that the video-based scenario is a feasible tool to assess candidate’s empathy in the MMI.

Highlights

  • Student selection is an important step in educating tomorrow’s doctors, and during this process, it is critical that candidates’ cognitive and non-cognitive attributes be assessed in order to select those with the qualities required of good doctors [1]

  • Our findings indicate that the use of a video-based scenario in the Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) to assess candidates’ empathy was perceived positively by the candidates and it fairly assessed their empathetic abilities as it was not biased against specific demographics or backgrounds

  • As Kreiter and Alexson [34] suggest, the practice of MMI can improve by research offering valid evidence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Student selection is an important step in educating tomorrow’s doctors, and during this process, it is critical that candidates’ cognitive and non-cognitive attributes be assessed in order to select those with the qualities required of good doctors [1]. Several research studies have shown the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing candidates’ non-cognitive qualities in medical student selection [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Research is needed on the MMI format that makes effective use of technology

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call