Abstract

BackgroundThe efficacy of dual-chamber cardiac pacing in neuro-mediated reflex syncope with a cardio-inhibitory response to the Tilt-Table test (TT) has not been definitively assessed so far. The lack of reproducibility of results from previous studies may be partially explained by discrepancies in subject selection and some weaknesses in design and methods. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has set a class IIb indication to pacemaker implantation in this population recommending further research.Methods/designThe BIOSync study is a multicenter, patient- and outcome-assessor-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled trial with the objective of assessing the clinical benefit of cardiac pacing in patients with frequently recurrent reflex syncope, suspected (but not proven) to be triggered by asystolic pauses as showing a VASIS 2B response to the TT (>3-s pause regardless of blood pressure drop). The primary and secondary endpoints are time to first post-implantation recurrence of syncope or the combination of pre-syncope or syncope, respectively. One hundred and twenty-eight consenting patients will be 1:1 randomized to dual-chamber cardiac pacing ‘on’ or ‘off’ after pacemaker implantation, and followed up until the first adjudicated primary endpoint event for a maximum of 2 years. The so-called Closed Loop Stimulation function on top of dual-chamber pacing is the pacing mode selected in the study active arm. Participating patients are asked to self-report syncopal symptoms at least every 3 months with self-administered questionnaires addressed to an independent Adjudication Committee. Patients and members of the Adjudicating Committee are blinded to randomization. The study is designed to detect a 40% relative reduction in the 2-year incidence of syncopal recurrences with 80% statistical power.DiscussionThe BIOSync study is designed to definitively assess the benefit of pacing against placebo in reflex syncope patients with a cardio-inhibitory response to the TT. The study will also provide important information on the efficiency of the TT in appropriately selecting reflex syncope patients for cardiac pacing.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02324920 (27 October 2016, date last accessed).

Highlights

  • The efficacy of dual-chamber cardiac pacing in neuro-mediated reflex syncope with a cardio-inhibitory response to the Tilt-Table test (TT) has not been definitively assessed so far

  • The study has been notified to the Competent Authorities of all participating countries which will receive a periodic report on the progress of the study and immediate notification of any serious adverse event observed by the investigators and reported to the study sponsor

  • The BIOSync study is expected to answer several questions concerning the real benefit of cardiac pacing and the effectiveness of the TT as a screening tool, while introducing a new methodological approach which should ensure complete blinding in the endpoint assessment

Read more

Summary

Discussion

The BIOSync study is expected to answer several questions concerning the real benefit of cardiac pacing and the effectiveness of the TT as a screening tool, while introducing a new methodological approach which should ensure complete blinding in the endpoint assessment. In the larger VASIS IIB patient cohort of the SUP 2 study [8], much better outcomes were observed, with a syncopal recurrence rate well below the range of confidence of the ISSUE-3 trial results: 3% (95% CI, 0–6) at 12 months and 17% (95% CI, 3–31) at 21 months. The BIOSync study is a randomized clinical trial designed to reliably assess the benefit of pacing against placebo in patients aged 40 years and older with frequent syncopal recurrences, with a cardio-inhibitory response to TT after all competing causes have been excluded.

Background
Methods/design
12. Hospitalization
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call