Abstract

Japan is one of the few rabies-free countries/territories which implement the policy of mandatory vaccination of domestic dogs. In order to assess the economic efficiency of such policy in reducing the economic burden of a future canine rabies outbreak in Japan, a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) was performed using probabilistic decision tree modelling. Input data derived from simulation results of published mathematical model, field investigation conducted by the authors at prefectural governments, literature review, international or Japanese database and empirical data of rabies outbreaks in other countries/territories. The current study revealed that the annual costs of implementing the current vaccination policy would be US$160,472,075 (90% prediction interval [PI]: $149,268,935–171,669,974). The economic burden of a potential single canine rabies outbreak in Japan were estimated to be US$1,682,707 (90% PI: $1,180,289–2,249,283) under the current vaccination policy, while it would be US$5,019,093 (90% PI: $3,986,882–6,133,687) under hypothetical abolition of vaccination policy, which is 3-fold higher. Under a damage-avoided approach, the annual benefits of implementing the current vaccination policy in expected value were estimated to be US$85.75 (90% PI: $55.73–116.89). The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was estimated to be 5.35 X 10−7 (90% PI: 3.46 X 10−7–7.37 X 10−7), indicating that the implementation of the current policy is very economically inefficient for the purpose of reducing the economic burden of a potential canine rabies outbreak. In worse-case scenario analysis, the BCR would become above 1 (indicating economic efficiency) if the risk of rabies introduction increased to 0.04 corresponding to a level of risk where rabies would enter Japan in 26 years while the economic burden of a rabies outbreak under the abolition of vaccination policy increased to $7.53 billion. Best-case analysis further revealed that under relatively extreme circumstances the economic efficiency of the current policy could be improved by decreasing the vaccination price charged to dog owners, relaxing the frequency of vaccination to every two to three years and implementing the policy on a smaller scale, e.g. only in targeted prefectures instead of the whole Japan.

Highlights

  • Since 1958, Japan has been free from animal rabies, i.e. classical rabies virus, and is one of the few rabies-free countries/territories which still implement the policy of mandatory vaccination of domestic dogs [1]

  • Pet owners in Japan are obliged to vaccinate their dogs against rabies every year either by attending a private veterinary clinic anytime during the year or a vaccination campaign organised by prefectural governments and Japan Veterinary Medical Association (JVMA) during April to June

  • The annual number of dogs and cats imported into Japan worldwide is approximately 8,000 and 2,000 through Animal Quarantine Service (AQS) managed by MAFF and United States Force Japan (USFJ), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 1958, Japan has been free from animal rabies, i.e. classical rabies virus, and is one of the few rabies-free countries/territories which still implement the policy of mandatory vaccination of domestic dogs [1]. In accordance with the Rabies Prevention Law enacted since 1950, the policy of registration and vaccination of domestic dogs against rabies is enforced by the prefectural governments under the order of Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) [1]. Pet owners in Japan are obliged to vaccinate their dogs against rabies every year either by attending a private veterinary clinic anytime during the year or a vaccination campaign organised by prefectural governments and Japan Veterinary Medical Association (JVMA) during April to June. Each year the respective prefectural government would assign the duty and provide a fund to the local Veterinary Medical Association to organise the rabies vaccination campaign mentioned above in multiple cities within the prefecture. Together with the low owner compliance mentioned above, massive debate has been raised in the country over whether the current annual rabies vaccination policy in domestic dogs should be maintained

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.