Beneficial effects of the 30-minute door-to-needle time standard for alteplase administration.

Abstract

ObjectiveThe American Heart Association recently raised the bar on the timely treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with intravenous alteplase. Our study looks at the effectiveness of this new standard, by examining the effect of varying door‐to‐needle times of alteplase initiation on the clinical, quality of care, and efficiency of care outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective case–control study examined 752 AIS patients treated with intravenous alteplase in a large academic health system during 2015–2018, and compared their outcomes after treatment within 30, 45, and 60 min of arrival. The outcomes compared were: (1) clinical – discharge and 90‐day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and post‐intravenous alteplase (24‐h) NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS); (2) quality of care – inpatient mortality, 30‐day readmission, discharge to home, and disability at discharge; (3) efficiency of care – length of stay (LOS) and index stroke hospitalization costs. Adjusted logistic and linear regression analyses were used to estimate the effects, after controlling for baseline characteristics.ResultsBased on the adjusted regression analyses, treatment within 30 min of arrival was associated with better post‐treatment mRS and NIHSS scores, and the clinical benefits were reduced when the windows were expanded to within 45 or 60 min. An important finding of the study was that treatment within 30 min of arrival significantly reduced the average LOS.InterpretationEarly intravenous alteplase treatment significantly improved clinical and efficiency of care outcomes. This study provides evidence that meeting the new AHA Target Stroke recommendations will help hospitals improve patient clinical outcomes and reduce LOS, thereby improving the efficiency of care standards.