Abstract
Cardiac myocyte atrophy and the resulting decreases to the left ventricular mass and dimensions are well documented in spinal cord injury. Therapeutic interventions that increase preload can increase the chamber size and improve the diastolic filling ratios; however, there are no data describing cardiac adaptation to chronic afterload increases. Research from our center has demonstrated that spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) can normalize arterial blood pressure, so we decided to investigate the effects of scES on cardiac function using echocardiography. Four individuals with chronic, motor-complete cervical spinal cord injury were implanted with a stimulator over the lumbosacral enlargement. We assessed the cardiac structure and function at the following time points: (a) prior to implantation; (b) after scES targeted to increase systolic blood pressure; (c) after the addition of scES targeted to facilitate voluntary (i.e., with intent) movement of the trunk and lower extremities; and (d) after the addition of scES targeted to facilitate independent, overground standing. We found significant improvements to the cardiac structure (left ventricular mass = 10 ± 2 g, p < 0.001; internal dimension during diastole = 0.1 ± 0.04 cm, p < 0.05; internal dimension during systole = 0.06 ± 0.03 cm, p < 0.05; interventricular septum dimension = 0.04 ± 0.02 cm, p < 0.05), systolic function (ejection fraction = 1 ± 0.4%, p < 0.05; velocity time integral = 2 ± 0.4 cm, p < 0.001; stroke volume = 4.4 ± 1.5 ml, p < 0.01), and diastolic function (mitral valve deceleration time = -32 ± 11 ms, p < 0.05; mitral valve deceleration slope = 50 ± 25 cm s–1, p < 0.05; isovolumic relaxation time = −6 ± 1.9 ms, p < 0.05) with each subsequent scES intervention. Despite the pilot nature of this study, statistically significant improvements to the cardiac structure, systolic function, and diastolic function demonstrate that scES combined with task-specific interventions led to beneficial cardiac remodeling, which can reverse atrophic changes that result from spinal cord injury. Long-term improvements to cardiac function have implications for increased quality of life and improved cardiovascular health in individuals with spinal cord injury, decreasing the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Highlights
Cardiac myocyte atrophy and the resulting decreases to the left ventricular mass and dimensions are well documented in spinal cord injury (Kessler et al, 1986; Eysmann et al, 1995; Gondim et al, 2004; Claydon et al, 2006; de Groot et al, 2006; MatosSouza et al, 2011; Hostettler et al, 2012; Driussi et al, 2014; Williams et al, 2019)
Data are the estimate (SE) of the echocardiography data obtained from individuals with spinal cord injury (n = 4) before and after spinal cord epidural stimulation and task-specific interventions
We found that significantly increased systolic function and diastolic function measures increased the left atrial and ventricular chamber and aortic root dimensions after spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) interventions
Summary
Cardiac myocyte atrophy and the resulting decreases to the left ventricular mass and dimensions are well documented in spinal cord injury (Kessler et al, 1986; Eysmann et al, 1995; Gondim et al, 2004; Claydon et al, 2006; de Groot et al, 2006; MatosSouza et al, 2011; Hostettler et al, 2012; Driussi et al, 2014; Williams et al, 2019). Therapeutic interventions that increase preload can increase the chamber size and improve the diastolic filling ratios in individuals with spinal cord injury, while athletes with spinal cord injury demonstrate greater left ventricle dimensions and improved relaxation velocities. This suggests that structural decreases in spinal cord injury are dynamic and can adapt to exercise interventions similar to non-injured individuals (Nash et al, 1991; Turiel et al, 2011; Maggioni et al, 2012; Guilherme et al, 2014). First, that scES targeted to alleviate hypotension would lead to alterations in cardiac structure and function due to greater afterload from increased arterial blood pressure, reported previously (Aslan et al, 2018; Harkema et al, 2018a,b), and, second, that the addition of non-weight-bearing and weightbearing motor interventions would alter the cardiac structure and function outcomes due to increased preload from the activation of the lower extremity and trunk muscles, with weight-bearing interventions eliciting the greatest improvements
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
