Abstract
Inspection agencies have been increasingly implementing unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for bridge inspections. Currently, UAS are typically used for long-range monitoring and surveillance tasks, but bridge managers are hopeful that they may be utilized for detailed inspection, such as condition assessments and the inspection of fracture critical members (FCMs) in the near future. As an assistive tool for visual inspections, the accuracy of UAS-assisted inspections is unknown. This study investigates the relationship between the characteristics of the individual inspectors and a set of performance metrics associated with UAS-assisted FCM inspections. Four bridge inspectors used a UAS to inspect a series of full-sized bridge specimens with known fatigue cracks. The inspection videos were later shared with 19 bridge inspectors for a desk review. The performance of each inspector was evaluated and compared with the results from 30 hands-on inspections of the same specimens. The results showed that an inspector’s past experience with UAS, licensure, and academic degree could have a significant influence on one or more of the three defined performance metrics. The comparison between the results of the UAS-assisted inspections and the hands-on inspections revealed that crack detection was comparable. However, the hands-on inspections were more accurate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
