Abstract

Water electrolysis is an important route for production of green hydrogen and remains a field of active research in pursuit of improved electrocatalytic activity and durability. Operating with a near-neutral feed is critical for this technology to be more widely adapted, because it allows the direct use of various water sources and imposes less stringent requirements on the components of the electrochemical cell.During water electrolysis, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) involving protons and hydroxides can experience a significant change in local pH at the surface of the catalyst, especially in near-neutral bulk conditions. This change in local pH is usually dictated by the reaction conditions such as electrolyte composition and mass transport within the system. Notably, there has been an increase in development of catalysts for water electrolysis with the ability to modulate their local pH in recent years. 1–6 However, comparing and quantifying the local pH modulation effects of these catalysts is challenging due to varying experimental techniques and protocols. The rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) with a potentiometric pH sensing ring has been presented as a promising and facile tool for in-situ local pH detection. 3,4,7,8 The local pH at the disk is estimated from the ring pH through solving the convective-diffusion equation under the well-defined mass transport conditions of an RRDE system. 8 In this study, we have investigated the local pH of iridium oxide during OER in both unbuffered and buffered electrolytes under near-neutral to alkaline bulk conditions using the RRDE technique. Our results provide benchmarks for future studies on the local pH modulation effects of catalysts and insights into the impact of electrolyte composition on local pH. In combination with mass transport modelling, we further examined the limitations of this technique and provide suggestions for best practices. References X. Liu et al., Appl. Catal. B Environ., 331, 122715 (2023).Z. Li et al., Angew. Chemie Int. Ed., 62, e202217815 (2023).J. Guo et al., Nat. Energy, 8, 264–272 (2023).X. Zheng et al., Nat. Commun. 2023 141, 14, 1–13 (2023).X. Wang, C. Xu, M. Jaroniec, Y. Zheng, and S. Z. Qiao, Nat. Commun. 2019 101, 10, 1–8 (2019).H. Tan et al., Nat. Commun. 2022 131, 13, 1–9 (2022).Y. Yokoyama et al., Chem. Lett., 49, 195–198 (2020).W. J. Albery and E. J. Calvo, J. Chem. SOC., Faraday Trans. 1, 79, 2583–2596 (1983). Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.